Chris Olson's Film Review Blog

OLSONS MOVIE BLOG


Reviewing Films Since 2010





Sunday, 24 April 2011

Red Riding Hood (2011)



A modern twist on the classic children's tale.


The Brothers Grimm wrote some of the most influential stories in the history of literature, and their fable Little Red Riding Hood is one of the popular folk tales ever. This modern interpretation takes the story and mutates it into an interesting form, playing with the characters and themes.



Valeria (Amanda Seyfried) is a girl living in a small village amongst the forests and mountains. Her life is torn by the boy she loves, Peter (Shilol Fernandez), and the one she is expected to marry, Henry (Max Irons). Valerie's family is not wealthy, her father being a woodcutter, and if she was to marry into henry's prominent family, they could attain a certain level of status and comfort. Outside of this love triangle, is the more pressing issue of a wolf that terrorizes the village. It appears during a full moon, and unless it is satisfied with an offering of livestock, it kills a member of the population. After Valerie's sister is killed, the village take up and arms and go in search of the wolf, intending to kill it. When the mob return with the head of a wolf, they think their troubles are over, but Father Solomon (Gary Oldman) turns up in time to inform them that they have killed a simple wolf, not a werewolf.



Solomon's men put the village under lock down, and start their search for the real killer, one of the people. The intensity increases as more encounters with the beast occur, and suspicion falls upon several people close to Valerie. Now, as secrets become the fuel for a ravaging fire in the village, Valerie must discover a way to end her people's suffering.



A clever take on the classic tale, Red Riding Hood falls, unfortunately, into the same category as these teen-vampire films. It is a sexualised movie, with brooding guys and beautiful girls, that seems to ooze teen angst. Performances are unmoving amongst the younger members of the cast, and viewers may find themselves wishing that the wolf just kills them all.




It must be said, however, that Gary Oldman's entrance into the film ushers in a worthwhile period, where the tension begins, and his performances lifts that of others. Director Catherine Hardwicke has done well to create a brilliant fantasy setting, that looks like a page in a child's storybook. The wooden buildings and leaning trees offer a splendid cinematography.



Many viewers will notice the Twilight similarities, such as the sweeping shots of forests from the sky, and the high-school script, but this film emerges as a stark contrast once the fantasy elements kick in alongside the classic folk elements.



Somewhere between Twilight and The Village, this film will not emerge as a cult classic, but a decent endeavour into the world of children's morality tales.

Sunday, 17 April 2011

An American Werewolf In London (1981)


Classic horror from director John Landis.


Werewolves form an important part of horror cinema, acting as one of the most intriguing and bloody subjects. Lycanthropy is filled with beastly gore, uncontrollable urges, and blood lust, making it a brilliant topic for the big screen. Landis' film An American Werewolf In London is a truly brilliant, classic horror film that has stood the test of time.


Two American tourists are travelling through England before they go south into Europe, and towards Rome. When they come across a wonderfully named pub, The Slaughtered Lamb, David and Jack are met with a stony local inhabitants, who seem awfully wary of outsiders. The pair are soon sent off into the night, with only some advice to keep them company, "Beware the moon". And beware the moon indeed, because soon enough, a vicious animal attacks the two, killing Jack and injuring David. Three weeks later David awakens in a hospital in London, with scars on his body. The police are saying that an escaped lunatic actually attacked them, but David's memory is clear. Soon, the young yank starts having nightmares about running through the jungle naked, and seeing his family murdered by monsters. His doctor worries for his mental health, while his nurse falls madly in love with him.


To make matters worse, David starts seeing his dead friend Jack walking the earth, claiming to be the undead. Jack warns David that he is now a werewolf, and must kill himself in order to save others, and release Jack from the curse.


A brilliant horror film, that combines both scary moments with comedic scenes. The storyline, while quite typical, is a great foundation to the film, simple but effective. The characters and vivid, memorable, and believable, and the gore is still impressive, even today. Some of the stunts are elaborate and extensive, making for an entertaining watch.


Musically, this film is awesome. It some specific, moon-oriented classics, like Creedence Clearwater Revival's "Bad Moon Rising", and places them in juxtaposing moments in the story, creating a hilarious moment of horror.


Performances are good, although seem slightly dated. David Naughton is very good as the leading role, creating a character that is funny, charming, and pitiful at the same time.


Landis has created a film that has inspired generations of horror filmmakers, and will continue to remain as a treasured classic amongst film lovers.

Silent Hill (2006)


Supernatural horror based on the popular video game.


Game-to-film transitions are never without issue, there seems to be problem creating the same sort of experiences for viewers, that gamers have. Silent Hill, directed by Christopher Gans, follows suit.


In an effort to rid her child of excruciating nightmares and panic attacks, Rose takes her daughter Sharon to Silent Hill, as the young girl keeps mentioning the place during her fits. The town is off the map, and nearby locals warn Rose of its danger, the town was consumed by a fire in the '70s and it still burns underground now. Rose ignores the protests, and eventually has to outrun a police car in order to gain access to the forbidden town on a hill. When she arrives, she crashes after seeing a figure in the road and swerving, and awakes to find Sharon gone, and only the police woman Bennett for company. Now Rose must find her daughter amongst the carnage of Silent Hill, where monsters, falling ash, and secrets run riot. In pursuit of her is her husband and a fumbling police team.


During her search of Silent Hill, Rose crosses paths with a number of ghouls, but she also comes across other women who have lost their child, and a church group who are seemingly trying to avoid "the darkness", and fight the demon.


Many aspects of this film are impressive. First off, the monsters are wonderfully imaginative, taking on vast extremes of horror. Throughout the film, the different creatures that Rose encounters seem to increase in the level of danger that they represent, much like the game. Another positive aspect to the film, is the cinematography. The town is presented in a covering of grey ash which produces some excellent visuals, and there is some brilliant camera work to convey the misery of this place.


That being said, the most fundamental flaw in this movie is the storyline. Its trouble is that it plays out like a game, not a film. The scenes seem to be haphazardly stuck together in a level-by-level basis, and the reactions of the characters seem to be completely unbelievable.


Interestingly, this film presents some excellent gender issues. It is almost a completely female cast, and the only male characters seem to be appallingly impotent. The nature of womanhood plays a large role in the story (one of the few interesting bits), and adds to a brilliant combination of love/horror.


An interesting take on the game, but a film that lacks coherency, and follows a structure that is predictable. Worth a watch for the monsters though!

Wednesday, 13 April 2011

Equilibrium (2002)


Futuristic paradise, where feeling and emotion are eradicated, leaving only a totalitarian system hell-bent on exterminating any traces of rebellion.


Build up to this movie included likening it to movies like The Matrix (1999) and Minority Report (2002). While some of the elements of Equilibrium are similar, the film differs vastly from those two. Director Kurt Wimmer has opted for a far duller looking movie, in terms of cinematography, and a storyline that is far simpler.


Christian Bale plays John Preston, a decorated government operative involved in the fight against the rebellion. His job is to locate, and punish/destroy any civilians who cling to the former way of living, i.e. anyone who owns any art, music, literature, and the like. The population are given a body-altering substance, which allows them to feel no emotion, or any of the animalistic urges such as anger, lust, or rage, which caused so much of history's misery. Predictably, Preston begins to question his government's actions, after reading a book and enjoying it. He then begins to stop taking his medication, and to go against protocol by showing empathy towards the rebellion.


A worthwhile piece of science fiction, Equilibrium attempts to make a watered down, action version of more complicated movies, such as the aforementioned. Some of the action sequences and special effects are impressive, and produce a pacey movie, but the film lacks the depth needed to make it an enduring Sci-Fi classic! The dull, grey look of the movie is unappealing, and the story line's typical references to totalitarian governments become achingly cliché.


If The Matrix was too complicated, slow, and deep for you, Equilibrium could the drug you need.

Sunday, 10 April 2011

The Perfect Storm (2000)


A sea-disaster film that does not sink.


Starring George Clooney, Mark Wahlberg and John C. Reilly as members of a group of fishermen who find themselves caught between two terrible storms that combine to create...the perfect storm. Set in a New England fishing town, a burly band of touch men join Captain Billy Tyne (Clooney) on a voyage out to sea, in a perilous fishing expedition. Each of the members has their own reasons for being on the ship, be it money, love, adventure, or obsession, but their motives soon become irrelevant when the pounding rains and fierce winds hit, causing their lives to come into danger.


From the outset, this film represents the humble fisherman's life authentically, representing the arduous struggle for the next big catch well. The film is filled with camaraderie and man-bonding, enough to make you feel a little awkward, but this only helps to add to the perilous atmosphere. Clooney is worthy of the lead role, providing a character portrayal that is engaging and intriguing. The crew are a decent band of men, fighting one moment, saving each other the next. John C. Reilly is particularly interesting.


The most effective element of this film is the use of water. Many of the stunts and scenes are breathtaking (excuse the pun), creating a claustrophobic and intense feeling. When the ship and crew are being beaten by the storms, it actually feels punishing, and real.


As with the majority of disaster films, the storyline plays out almost as expected, apart from the ending, which was a pleasant surprise. However, it is a film that holds ground even 11 years after its original release, and cements its place in cinematic history, if only for that infamous image of the gigantic wave with the tiny boat.

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Mystic River (2003)


A gripping story of how our childhood experiences can shape our destinies.


From the acclaimed actor and director, Clint Eastwood, comes a film set in in urban Boston about three young boys who experience a childhood tragedy. One day, whilst Jimmy, Dave, and Sean are playing in the street, a car pulls up and a well dressed man confronts the boys. He reprimands them for drawing their names in wet cement, saying he is a police officer. Two of the boys say they live on the same street, but Dave says he lives on another street, so the "officer" puts him in the back of the car, saying he is going to take him to his house, and tell his mother about the boy's crime. As you may have guessed, the man is not a police officer, but a kidnapper, and he takes Dave away to a cabin in the woods, where the boy is locked in a basement and abused for four days.


The story then moves to the future, and we quickly learn how the boys' fates have played out. Sean is now a detective for the police department, Jimmy is a notorious former gangster, and Dave is a timid family man. When Jimmy's daughter is murdered during a night out, all three former friends become involved in the case. Sean (Kevin Bacon) and his partner Whitey Powers (Laurence Fishburne) investigate the murder, whilst competing against Jimmy (Sean Penn) and his gangster friends who lead their investigation. Dave (Tim Robbins) becomes a suspect in the case. As the film develops into a tense race to find the truth, all actions seem to lead back to that fateful day in their past.


What makes this film an excellent thriller, is Eastwood's penchant for drama with no fat. It sticks to a trim narrative, avoids confusing devices, and relies on the performances to drive the story. Throughout the movie, viewers may find themselves becoming more and more addicted as each scene unfolds. The dialogue is sharp and realistic, and the music is sparse, adding to the edgy feel.


Notable performances are several. Foremost, for me, is Sean Penn. His delivery and emotion is undeniably genius, making for a compelling character. Tim Robbins is darkly magnificent as the troubled Dave, taking on a persona that is both unpleasant yet pitiful. Laurence Fishburne is also worthy of mention, his plays the supporting role brilliantly, and adds a dimension of humour and aggression which is vital.


Some critics have argued that this film plays out more like a TV movie than a cinematic blockbuster. To those, I would say that Eastwood has created a film that blends the best of both those mediums. Mystic River is an enthralling tale (based on a book by Dennis Lehane), its enduring themes of childhood innocence being spoiled, and the consequences of our actions, leaves for a relevant and poignant film.

Monday, 4 April 2011

The Wrestler (2008)


The heartbreaking story of an aging wrestler who struggles to find his place in the world outside of the ring.


Outstanding director Darren Aronofsky brings a touching film that is loaded with questions about the nature of professional wrestlers, and their lives in America. Set in the trailer parks and local gyms of the U.S., this movie finds the devastating truth behind the masks, the fake fighting, and pretend props.


Randy "The Ram" (Mickey Rourke) was one of the most famous wrestlers during the 80's. He enjoyed the spoils of his success, and became obsessed with the lights, glamour, and action. To the detriment of his family, Randy dedicated his whole life to the ring, and became estranged from his family, including his daughter Stephanie (Evan Rachel Wood). The only company "The Ram" seems to find is with a local stripper called Cassidy (Marisa Tomei), who only seems to care as long as Randy buys a lap dance. Whilst taking part in the less popular, local underground wrestling scene, Randy's life also consists of working in a supermarket to make to ends meet, and pay for his humble trailer. During one match, Randy suffers a heart attack, and is told he must stop wrestling for good. It is here that the aging athlete discovers that his whole life has been lived through the eyes of his fans, and there is nothing out there for him.


An absolutely knock out film, that is the story about a man who takes a beating for a living in order to be a part of a family. His fellow wrestlers are like his brothers, and his fans are his blood, the thing that keeps him going. It is a brutal truth when Randy realises that without wrestling, his life amounts to very little. In conjunction with this, Cassidy's life as a stripper is as demeaning, being a subject of desire for others, pleasing their needs, in order to gain a life. The only difference for her is a child at home who she wants to protect.


In contrast to the bright lights and advertisement of professional wrestling, The Wrestler looks far dirtier and painful. It focuses on the desperation of the people involved, to stay at the top of their game by working out and taking steroids. Aronofsky uses handheld cameras and intimate closeups to portray the grim reality that wrestlers face.


Many may go into this film thinking it is going to be an all out action wrestling film, but it is definitely not. This is a movie that displays a story so touching and stark that it deserves the highest of accolades. Rourke is immense as Randy, both in physical and emotional terms. The camaraderie between the wrestlers is beautiful, and the strength of character that these people display is remarkable.


A truly brilliant film.

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

The Eagle (2011)


The journey of a Roman warrior and his slave to find the lost Eagle of the Roman army, and restore his family's honour.


Set during Roman-occupation of Britain, The Eagle follows the efforts of a young Roman soldier called Marcus Aquila (Channing Tatum) to recover the golden emblem of the lost 9th Roman Legion. Marcus' father led the infamous 9th Legion into the Northern territories of Britain, where the lands are a barbaric mix of brutal landscapes and unforgiving tribes. When the 9th Legion failed to return home safely, the name of Aquila was tarnished with dishonour. Having rose through the ranks of the Roman army, Marcus sought to regain his family's honour by being a great military leader, which he was, until during his first battle he is severely wounded. Given an honourable discharge, Marcus is left with unfulfilled desires, until he learns that the golden eagle of his father's legion has been seen in the north. He quickly heads to border between Roman Britain and the unconquered north with his slave Esca (Jamie Bell). Esca is a Britain who was captured during one of Rome's battles with the natives, his family was slain by the soldiers, and he remains a bitter individual. His loyalty to Marcus only exists due to a chance encounter whereby the Roman soldier stopped the slave from being brutally murdered.


As the duo head north in search of the emblem, the balance of power shifts between them. Marcus is now the unfamiliar enemy, while Esca is the native-speaking guide. Their uneasy co-existence is the most compelling aspect of the film, one that draws the viewer in. Jamie Bell is brilliant as Esca, his reputation grows stronger from each film. Tatum, initially, is hard to care about. Only in the second half does his appeal grow.


The battle scenes of the film are often labored and stagnant. They try to draw inspiration from films such as Troy and 300 but it is not in the same league. A more interesting film would have focused more on the relationship of the two main characters, and avoided cinematic devices like heads being chopped off and blood spurting everywhere.


Viewers may find it difficult to become attached to the characters, as the quest is an outdated search for honour and pride, one that modern audiences may not relate to. However, if you enjoyed the likes of Kingdom of Heaven and Centurion, this is probably a film for you. The romantic slant on Roman occupation is heavily felt, especially in the first half of the film. It is a pretty movie though, with great landscapes and interesting tribal characters. The dialogue is not too cringe worthy, and the story is entertaining, if not old fashioned. Of the current films out at cinemas is lacks the appeal that bigger and better films have (such as Battle: Los Angeles or Unknown).

Sunday, 27 March 2011

The Blind Side (2009)


American socio-drama that literally "tackles" issues of race, homelessness, class and...Football.


From director John Lee Hancock, comes a film inspired by a true story about a homeless, abandoned black youth, who is taken in by an affluent white family, and his talent for American Football. Michael Oher (Quinton Aaron) is a lonely child whose life has been tough. Sleeping on couches, moving from foster families, a mother addicted to crack, his world is the forgotten society of America. When he finds himself enrolled at a private Christian high school, he remains homeless, teachers unwilling to help him, and having to scrape his way through. Until a chance encounter with a tenacious mum and her white collar family lands Michael a spot on their couch, and a place in their life.


Leigh Anne Tuohy (Sandra Bullock) is the mother of the Tuohy family, and she is an organised, determined designer for celebrities, and her no-fuss approach to life extends to her home. After taking Michael into her home, Leigh Anne goes in search of the boy's unknown past, and learns more than she bargained for. After changing Michael's life, the Tuohy family all experience a similar change, and their perceptions of race and class alter permanently. The collision of cultures makes for a dramatic tale, the prejudices and conflicts are a constant source for great movies. In addition to Michael's disruption to the white suburbs, he also catches the attention of the authorities, who believe that the Tuohy family are "boosting" him (bribing him in order to take his athletic abilities to a college of their choosing).


A heartwarming film that relies heavily on issues rather than the excitement of American football. The clash of cultures is a popular element to movies, however, The Blind Side is a worthy addition, one that has vivid, engaging characters, and excellent story development. Indeed, the structure of the film becomes layered as it goes on, adding many different aspects which are compelling. Bullock's performance is inspiring, worthy of her accolades, and many of the other supporting parts are well performed, making for a high class film.


Viewers should not fear a large amount of football, it is far more focused on the drama of the characters. The only football which is shown is entertaining and adds a tempo that is important to drive the movie on. Music is well chosen, creating excellent atmospheres along the way.


If this film does not bring a tear to your eye, you are probably dead inside.

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Robin Hood (2010)


Director Ridley Scott produces a Hood film worthy of the legend.


Mythical hero Robin Hood has been the subject of many productions, and his name conjures a multitude of different representations. When a new Robin Hood film was announced, its only saving grace was that Scott was on board as director, and the results are impressive.


The story begins during the crusades, as King Richard the Lion Heart makes his way back to England. During a bloody siege of a castle, the King is killed. As part of the King's army, Robin Hood and his fellow archer friends, realise the predicament of the situation, and must make their way back to England immediately. Fate throws them a lifeline after they stumble upon an ambush of the King's men, and overthrow the enemy. With the opportunity to pose as Royal officers, Hood and his gang are able to find passage home. Whilst in character, Hood must then present the crown of the fallen King to his Mother, who then crowns her other son Prince John.


Hood then makes his way to a small village to fulfil his promise to one of the King's men who died in the ambush, to take his sword back to his father, Sir Walter Loxley. Whilst there, Hood must maintain his false identity, this time as Loxely's son, in order to stop the man's land being taken away from him. This involves Hood pretending to be married to the lovely Marion Loxley. As Hood's life become a complex world of deceit and defence, his country spirals into chaos with the new King John on the throne. Political treachery is at hand, and the barons of the country rise in arms against the new king who is determined to bleed them dry. A secret French invasion adds to the conflict, and Hood becomes more than a pretend landowner.


It is an intense portrayal of the Robin Hood story, which takes the King Richard/King John era and the Magnacarta, and uses it perfectly to create a film that is robustly entertaining. Russel Crowe provides a brilliant performance as Hood, one which is gruff, dark and heroic. Cate Blanchet is superb as Lady Marion, with a performance that is engaging and realistic.


Scott does an excellent job of creating a 13th Century England that seems authentic in its dirtiness. The royal drama of the castles is contrasted geniusly with the downtrodden villages and battlefields.


The film is of an extended length, running at two and a half hours with the directors cut, but one of those films that is worth the extra minutes. It is a well developed story that encompasses a lot of history. Some of the editing is weak in places, voices become mumbled and incoherent, but that could be down to the "interesting" accents several of the actors adopt.


In summary, a Robin Hood film that is earthy, fulfilling and expertly executed.